Jasc paint shop pro 8 vs gimp manuals#
Jasc paint shop pro 8 vs gimp pro#
Jasc paint shop pro 8 vs gimp professional#

This is a pity, since the program itself is getting mighty powerfull. All other programs (except, maybe dwarf fortress) pale in comparison. If you want a horrible UI, then go look at Blender3d.

Jasc paint shop pro 8 vs gimp manuals#

Libre Office writer is good enough to handle large technical documents including operating manuals with very complex page numbering (LO-Calc remains lacklustre).

Jasc paint shop pro 8 vs gimp professional#

Gimp covers all my personal and professional needs for bitmap processing (including website work).Д®xpanding my free toolbox, Inkscape covers all vector graphics needs, including backporting pdf's to dxf for import into CAD (reverse engineering parts that do not come with a 3d model). I am still loosing the toolboxes every now and then, but otherwise the menu's do what they say that they do, inclunding the opening of new toolboxes. In my eyes, the Gimp UI is not a problem. Yeah, yeah, we know what the acronym stands for, but we all refer to it as GIMP, which *is* an insulting term. I admit that the UI could definitely use a lot of work and that it needs a name change. Or use the Layers & History box: IIRC 'history' is the second tab from the left once it's selected, you can step backwards through every action you've taken. Draw (or erase) a straight line: select the brush or pencil and a size, then click at the starting point on the image, hold down the SHIFT key and click around the endpoint (as long as you don't release the SHIFT key you can readjust it). Choose a brush/pencil size: select the shape in the tool box, then tweak the 'size' control beneath it or use the keys to increase/decrease size. To respond to some of the things mentioned in this thread: I believe GIMP's UI is fairly similar to that old version of Photoshop - I know that when I tried using a recent CS edition, I was frustratingly lost due to the UI changes. I'm only moderately technically-oriented, learned Photoshop up through an advanced (class) level about 17 years ago (last version prior to the 'CS' junk), but had little trouble switching to GIMP in 2008. You have to do the same with Photoshop if you've not used it before, why not give Gimp the same chance?ДЄnd on the name, come on are you really going to complain about the name! Come on, lots of things have names that don't specify exactly what they do. You just have to take the time to learn it. 6 months on and when I use Photoshop I find myself thinking 'This is easier in Gimp', of course there are also times when I think, 'Photoshop is better at this' and hope that Gimp catches on but they are not as numerous as you'd think.ДЇrom my rant, just take it as I really like Gimp a lot now when I would only use Photoshop 6 months ago. Learning the different way layers work, the UI etc. So I went back to try Gimp, to start with it is a sharp learning curve because yes, it's different than Photoshop and looks at things from a different perspective. I needed Photoshop 6 months ago but was unwilling to go their subscription model. Sort of how the win10 start menu was intended, but failed miserably to do.Д¬ome on, it's just learning a different way of doing things. It shouldn't require an internet connection. Given that a lot of these functions are called the same, but are in different menus, a search/help system where you could type in the name would be amazingly useful. When you spend longer googling 'How do I do x in y software' than actually doing it, there is a problem. Is it a tool? a plugin? Will be next to the related (but different) canvas size or maybe crop? What is the distinction that decides if something is under the edit menu or elsewhere?

Jasc paint shop pro 8 vs gimp pro#

Paintshop Pro (pre Corel) was the only one to get things right. In many image editing programs, you have to guess where the function you want to use is and hope the developers thought the same way. One of the reasons why I prefer nano the the behemoths that are Vi and EMACS is the discoverability of features. It goes to a sub folder three layers deep where I was last time.) I click on the top folder on the sidebar, and it does not show me the contents of said top folder. Just different enough that I loose orientation. Then there's the file explorer it has for 'File Open' it has in it that behaves totally different (not even bad. Things like selection fields do not just show the options when I click on the little down arrow вЂ“ I have to click AND HOLD, contrary to everywhere else on the system. Affinity Photo shows them context sensitive when needed.), and cannot remember that I turned it off (it remembers all other kinds of shit from last session. Things like that it shows layer boundaries by default (no other graphics program I use does. Each of these things are, by themselves, merely mild irritations. It's that there so many things it does slightly different than everything else. Re: Forget the geeky stuff, sort out the user experience.